Chapter 04 · Compare

Two minds, side by side.

Pick any two players. We'll line up their average rounds, their category differences, and the codes that fire louder in one mind than the other. Same temporal axis, same codes/round normalisation, so the comparison stays honest.

Player A

Player B

P02RadiantVCL

Autonomous Reactor

Externally weighted attention with a calm post-event signature; team-mediated planning offload visible.

Abyss · Lost · 7-13 · 20r · 1.38 codes/seg

P04Radiant

IGL Absorber

Reflective-mind dominant. Carries team-coordination cognition on top of individual combat load.

Haven · Won · 13-7 · 20r · 1.84 codes/seg

Density

1.38/segvs1.84/seg

Δ 0.45/seg (favours B)

AC ext share

40.9%vs44.7%

Δ 3.8% (favours B)

AM share

10.2%vs22.7%

Δ 12.5% (favours B)

GS share

40.9%vs21.6%

Δ 19.2% (favours A)

P02 · average round

This player's average round · codes per round, smoothed across the seven temporal .

AC int

AC ext

peak ≈ 2.7 codes/round (half-height)

P04 · average round

This player's average round · codes per round, smoothed across the seven temporal .

AC int

AC ext

peak ≈ 3.6 codes/round (half-height)

Parent split — head to head

Attentional Metacognitions

P02 10.2%P04 22.7%

Attentional Control · Internal

P02 8.1%P04 11.0%

Attentional Control · External

P02 40.9%P04 44.7%

Game Situation

P02 40.9%P04 21.6%

Where they differ

Codes that distinguish one of these players from the cohort. Bars push left for P02 and right for P04; the longer the bar, the further from baseline that player runs on that type of thought.

—
confidence
+2.31σ
—
score awareness
+1.94σ
—
enemy mental
+1.69σ
+1.62σ
acceptance
—
+1.59σ
hazard awareness
—
—
teammate anticipation
+1.52σ
+1.43σ
map awareness
—
—
teammate awareness
+1.43σ