Chapter 04 · Compare

Two minds, side by side.

Pick any two players. We'll line up their average rounds, their category differences, and the codes that fire louder in one mind than the other. Same temporal axis, same codes/round normalisation, so the comparison stays honest.

Player A

Player B

P05RadiantVCT

Mixed Strategist

Balanced across parents with a slight tilt toward situational anticipation.

Corrode · Won · 13-2 · 15r · 1.42 codes/seg

P04Radiant

IGL Absorber

Reflective-mind dominant. Carries team-coordination cognition on top of individual combat load.

Haven · Won · 13-7 · 20r · 1.84 codes/seg

Density

1.42/segvs1.84/seg

Δ 0.41/seg (favours B)

AC ext share

49.3%vs44.7%

Δ 4.6% (favours A)

AM share

11.7%vs22.7%

Δ 11.0% (favours B)

GS share

27.8%vs21.6%

Δ 6.2% (favours A)

P05 · average round

This player's average round · codes per round, smoothed across the seven temporal .

AC int

AC ext

peak ≈ 3.0 codes/round (half-height)

P04 · average round

This player's average round · codes per round, smoothed across the seven temporal .

AC int

AC ext

peak ≈ 3.6 codes/round (half-height)

Parent split — head to head

Attentional Metacognitions

P05 11.7%P04 22.7%

Attentional Control · Internal

P05 11.2%P04 11.0%

Attentional Control · External

P05 49.3%P04 44.7%

Game Situation

P05 27.8%P04 21.6%

Where they differ

Codes that distinguish one of these players from the cohort. Bars push left for P05 and right for P04; the longer the bar, the further from baseline that player runs on that type of thought.

—
confidence
+2.31σ
+2.06σ
anticipatory positioning
—
—
score awareness
+1.94σ
+1.93σ
emotions
—
—
enemy mental
+1.69σ
+1.57σ
economy awareness
—
—
teammate anticipation
+1.52σ
—
teammate awareness
+1.43σ